Actor Rajpal Yadav has paid Rs. Rs 2.5 crores pending for a long time. The check bounce case of Rs 9 crore against him was disclosed by his lawyer Bhaskar Upadhyay on Friday. The development comes a day after the Delhi High Court sent the actor to judicial custody till at least Monday after adjourning the hearing on his interim bail plea.
Rajpal Yadav has paid Rs. Rs 2.5 crore. Check bounce case of Rs 9 crore, lawyer’s disclosure
Speaking to NDTV, Upadhyay said, “There has been no refusal to give the money that was invested for the purpose of investment. Earlier also when there was talk of money, the company had refused to take the money. Negotiations are going on on the 2012 agreement, in which three months have passed.” He said, “I cannot say anything about who gave the money to Rajpal Yadav, it is a family matter. I will go to the jail myself and tell them how to do it. So far, Rs 2.5 crore out of Rs 5 crore has been given. Let’s see what the court decides on Monday.”
As per the current situation, Rajpal Yadav is serving a six-month jail sentence after the High Court rejected his last-minute plea for relief in the case. The actor had surrendered in Tihar jail on February 5.
The incident dates back to 2010, when Yadav had borrowed money for his directorial debut film. address missing. The film failed to perform at the box office, and the loan amount eventually turned into a significant financial liability. Over the years, several check bounce complaints were filed against him.
On February 2, the High Court said that Yadav was directed to deposit Rs. Rs 1.35 crore in each of the seven cases pending against him and ordered that the amount already deposited with the Registrar General be distributed to the complainant. The court also said that in October 2025, two demand drafts amounting to Rs. Rs 75 lakh was deposited, although a substantial amount was not paid.
Now that the partial payment has been confirmed, all eyes are on Monday’s hearing, which is expected to decide the actor’s interim bail plea and the future course of the case.
